Difference between revisions of "Self-Facilitated Games"

Revision as of 13:20, 8 January 2011

Games that require that the people involved in the gameplay ensure that the rules are being followed and require that these people perform any necessary book-keeping actions.

All games require effort to setup and update the game state. When there are no other people, or machines, dedicated to this the players themselves need to perform this work. These types of games are Self-Facilitated Games, are requires that at least one of the players learns the rules before or during gameplay. Even if Self-Facilitated Games force players to work, they also allow the players to modify or ignore rules at their discretion.

Examples

Tradition board games such as Chess and Go, as well as newer ones such as Cluedo, Monopoly, and RoboRally, require the players themselves to set up and move game pieces and, if they wish to break gameplay into several different play sessions, store the game state safely. The same goes for card games such as Illuminati and Magic: The Gathering. Children's games such as Tag are the same, except they also require the players to judge if players have been caught or not. Even if the board game Space Alert uses an audio track to further gameplay during its first phase, it can be said to be a Self-Facilitated Game during its second and final phase since players then have to resolve the gameplay outcome.

Wargames such as Advanced Squad Leader and Warhammer 40K require their players to move large amounts of units as part of controlling armies and their logistics. The decedents of war and miniature games, tabletop roleplaying games such as Call of Cthulhu, Paranoia, and Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay, do have game masters that take care of responsibility of knowing the game rules and handling most of their inhabitants of the game world. However, players have to do some work as well and the role of game master often rotates, so these games can be considered Self-Facilitated Games.

Early multiplayer online games such as Kingdoms and DragonMud were setup and maintained by their own players. While only experienced and trusted players (called wizards) were allowed to actually change the code controlling the games, this still makes these games Self-Facilitated Games. The development of game rules by the players as they play is the main feature of some board and card games, e.g. Nomic and Bartok.

Using the pattern

Self-Facilitated Games requires the will of the players to uphold the game state and the game rules, the latter which can be seen as requiring Strategic Knowledge. The Memorizing this demands can be made easier in a number of ways: the rules of the game can be made as explicit and deterministic so that any player can perform them while the others watch; Turn Taking in Turn-Based Games can be used so that only one player at a time performs actions and the others can check the correctness of the actions; and Book-Keeping Tokens can be used to minimize the amount of the game state that has to be remembered by all players.

Players do not have to do all work involved in facilitating Self-Facilitated Games. Computer systems may support or even handle the main update routines (as for MUDs such as Kingdoms or DragonMud) but as long as at least some players have Privileged Abilities to modify the game state or change it through Evolving Rule Sets the games can be considered Self-Facilitated Games. Other types of Privileged Abilities are possible, e.g. handling the bank's money in Monopoly or being temporary judges. Game Masters of Roleplaying games such as Dungeons & Dragons or Paranoia are Dedicated Game Facilitators where the facilitators can still be perceived as players with Privileged Abilities since some of their activities are similar to those of players, e.g. controlling Non-Player Characters as players control Player Characters. By doing this, and have the same freedom to introduce, modify, or ignore rules that players of purely Self-Facilitated Games have, the use of human Game Masters show how in this special case Self-Facilitated Games and Dedicated Game Facilitators can be combined. The Privileged Abilities some people of Self-Facilitated Games have, as well as the Investments they do to run Self-Facilitated Games, can give them Game-Induced Player Social Status.

Practically any game can be the basis for a Meta Game based on Betting which is facilitated by the players themselves.

Diegetic Aspects

Providing Effect Descriptions and Storytelling for Self-Facilitated Games naturally falls on the players (and Game Masters if present). This can be a mixed blessing: although

Narrative Aspects

Self-Facilitated Games, especially if they have human Game Masters, can easily support Never Ending Stories since they have people available to change expand the Narration Structures as gameplay progresses. Although Storytelling can emerge from Self-Facilitated Games, as for example the story-telling game Once Upon a Time, these games have difficulties having supporting Predetermined Story Structures that have Tension or Surprises due to problems of timing. There does not have to be a problem creating Emotional Attachment though, the creation of narratives through Storytelling in Player Constructed Worlds are often an important reason for wanting to participate in these games, especially if this is combined with using Player Characters.

Consequences

It is unavoidable that Self-Facilitated Games give players some Excise, especially in games with many game elements like the Units-rich game such as Warhammer 40K or those requiring the players to calculate the actions of AI Players, but at the same time they get the Empowerment to control the gameplay.

Since players need to interpret the rules and outcomes together through Negotiation, rule arguments are likely in Self-Facilitated Games. However, it also allows them to have Player Decided Rule Setup and Evolving Rule Sets (especially those with human Game Masters), potentially helping create Player and Team Balance through improvised Handicap Systems. Reaching consensus about outcomes in game instances where Extra-Game Consequences such as monetary rewards or Game-Induced Player Social Status are at stake can however be difficult. For this reason, many games that are self-facilitated normally have judges in Tournaments of the game or when Betting is involved. Sports are examples of Real-Time Games and Synchronous Games that are Self-Facilitated Games where judges are especially common since rule interpretation depends on physical actions in the real world.

One aspect of being able to control the gameplay in Self-Facilitated Games is the Freedom of Choice to modify rules, and especially the game state. This makes it possible to improvise so that Late Arriving Players or even Drop-In/Drop-Out can work, at least for those focused not heavily focus on PvP or Competition (it is least problematic for Unwinnable Games or those with Never Ending Stories which typically include Roleplaying games).

Players may replace any results with Player Decided Results in [Self-Facilitated Games]] and this can make it difficult to enforce Ultra-Powerful Events. Likewise, Time Limits are harder to enforce and especially events based upon The Show Must Go On.

Self-Facilitated Games do not make use of Dedicated Game Facilitators with the exception of when one considered human Game Masters as part of the people playing the game.

Relations

Can Instantiate

Drop-In/Drop-Out, Evolving Rule Sets, Excise, Freedom of Choice, Game-Induced Player Social Status, Investments, Negotiation, Never Ending Stories, Player Balance, Storytelling, Team Balance

with Unwinnable Games or Never Ending Stories

Late Arriving Players, Player Decided Rule Setup

with Betting

Meta Games

Can Modulate

-

Can Be Instantiated By

Humans

Can Be Modulated By

Game Masters, Privileged Abilities

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

Dedicated Game Facilitators, The Show Must Go On, Time Limits, Ultra-Powerful Events

History

An updated version of the pattern Self-Facilitated Games that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design^[1].

References

1. ↑ Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.