Difference between revisions of "Complex Gameplay"

From gdp3
Jump to: navigation, search
(Relations)
(Relations)
Line 34: Line 34:
 
---
 
---
  
 
[[Quests]]
 
 
[[Abilities]]
 
[[Decreased Abilities]]
 
[[Ability Losses]]
 
[[Parties]]
 
 
[[Skills]]
 
[[Skills]]
 
[[Orthogonal Differentiation]]
 
[[Orthogonal Differentiation]]
Line 90: Line 83:
  
 
=== Can Be Instantiated By ===
 
=== Can Be Instantiated By ===
 +
[[Abilities]],
 
[[Algorithmic Agents]],  
 
[[Algorithmic Agents]],  
 
[[Attention Swapping]],  
 
[[Attention Swapping]],  
Line 123: Line 117:
  
 
(have below as example for [[Enemies]] and [[Goal Hierarchies)
 
(have below as example for [[Enemies]] and [[Goal Hierarchies)
 +
 
[[Quests]] together with with [[Enemies]] or [[Goal Hierarchies]]
 
[[Quests]] together with with [[Enemies]] or [[Goal Hierarchies]]
  
 
=== Can Be Modulated By ===
 
=== Can Be Modulated By ===
 +
[[Ability Losses]],
 
[[Limited Foresight]],  
 
[[Limited Foresight]],  
 
[[Limited Planning Ability]],  
 
[[Limited Planning Ability]],  

Revision as of 16:48, 11 January 2015

The one-sentence "definition" that should be in italics.

This pattern is a still a stub.

(Right level of complexity)

Examples

Anti-Examples

optional

Using the pattern

Diegetic Aspects

Interface Aspects

Narration Aspects

Consequences

Relations

in wiki already

---

Skills Orthogonal Differentiation Trumps Puzzle Solving Traverse Variable Accuracy Asynchronous Collaborative Actions Resources Solution Uncertainty


to add


Orthogonal Differentiation

old


Constructive Play,

Downtime, Illusion of Influence

Narrative Structures

Extra-Game Information

Can Instantiate

Challenging Gameplay, Cognitive Engrossment, Creative Control, Excise, Experimenting, FUBAR Enjoyment, Game Mastery,

(put this as example of above game mastery)

with Combos

Game Mastery

with Resource Management

Grinding

Can Modulate

Analysis Paralysis, Stimulated Planning

Can Be Instantiated By

Abilities, Algorithmic Agents, Attention Swapping, Budgeted Action Points, Combos, Converters, Dedicated Game Facilitators, Enemies, Game Masters, Indirect Control, Internal Rivalry, Movement, Optional Rules, Perfect Information, Producer-Consumer, Red Herrings, Resource Management, Rhythm-Based Actions, Rock-Paper-Scissors, Role Reversal, Units, Varying Rule Sets

Betrayal together with Cooperation or Teams

Collaborative Actions together with Delayed Effects or Delayed Reciprocity

Trading together with Delayed Effects

(have below as example for Algorithmic Agents, Dedicated Game Facilitators, or Game Masters)

Non-Player Characters with Algorithmic Agents, Dedicated Game Facilitators, or Game Masters

(have below as example for Enemies and [[Goal Hierarchies)

Quests together with with Enemies or Goal Hierarchies

Can Be Modulated By

Ability Losses, Limited Foresight, Limited Planning Ability, Smooth Learning Curves, Time Pressure, Varying Rule Sets

Possible Closure Effects

-

Potentially Conflicting With

Predictable Consequences

History

An heavily updated version of the pattern Right Level of Complexity that was part of the original collection in the book Patterns in Game Design[1]. The update has made the pattern be rather close to the concept of analytic complexity described in Costikyan's book Uncertainty in Games[2].

References

  1. Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004) Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media. ISBN1-58450-354-8.
  2. Costikyan, G. 2013. Uncertainty in Games. MIT Press. Official webpage for the book.

Acknowledgements

-